Cases 51 - 57 of 57
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2008cv01046
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Hector Rodriguez, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Rodriguez-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Acevedo et al
as 3:2007cv01794
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Carlos Acevedo, Jane 1 Doe, Conjugal Partnership Acevedo-Doe1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Arroyo-Miranda et al
as 3:2007cv01792
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Hector Arroyo-Miranda, Jane Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Arroyo-Doe1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Lopez et al
as 3:2007cv01796
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Lucy Lopez, John Doe, Conjugal Partnership Doe-Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Garcia-Mercado et al
as 3:2007cv01793
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Abraham Garcia-Mercado, Jane 1 Doe, Conjugal Partnership Garcia-Doe1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Bauza-Ramos et al
as 3:2007cv01795
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Carmen Bauza-Ramos, John 1 Doe, Conjugal Partnership Doe1-Bauza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
United States of America et al v. Amgen Inc.
as 1:2006cv10972
Defendant:
Intergrated Nephrology Network doing business as Dialysis Purchasing Alliance formerly known as International Nephrology Network, Amgen Inc., International Nephrology Network and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware and others
Not Classified By Court:
Deponent #1, #2 Non-Party Deponent, #3 Non-Party Deponent and others
Not Yet Classified:
Amag Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
