Cases 1 - 10 of 751
US v. Acevedo-Rodriguez
as 24-1455
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
BRIAN JERIEL ACEVEDO-RODRIGUEZ
Naicom Corporation, et al v. Dish Network Corporation, et al
as 24-1416
Plaintiff:
NAICOM CORPORATION, D&V IP HOLDINGS, LLC, PAYLINK, LLC and others
Defendant:
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK L.L.C., NAGRASTAR L.L.C. and others
Calderon Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-1384
Petitioner:
VICTOR ENRIQUE CALDERON RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Rodriguez-Torres
as 24-1319
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
US v. Rodriguez-Torres
as 24-1320
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Jimenez-Rodriguez
as 24-1089
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS YADIER JIMENEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez-Lopez v. Colon
as 3:2024cv01025
Petitioner:
Juan M Febres, Alexis Rodriguez-Lopez and Juan M. Febres
Respondent:
Rey Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
US v. Rodriguez-Agueda
as 24-1030
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN RODRIGUEZ-AGUEDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
