Cases 1 - 10 of 21
US v. Candelaria-Silva
as 22-1888
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
EULALIO CANDELARIA-SILVA, a/k/a Gatillo Macho
Interested Party:
PR DEPT OF TREASURY, ERNESTO GONZALEZ-MORALES, JOSE ANIBAL CABRANES and others
US v. Martinez-Candelaria
as 21-1440
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL MARTINEZ-CANDELARIA, a/k/a Miky
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
EMMA M. GREENWOOD, Court Appointed Coordinating Discovery Attorney
Hiram Perez-Soto v. Oronoz, et al
as 21-1404
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGDALIA FRATICELLI-TORRES, Judge of the Appeals Court, HON. GISELLE ROMERO-GARCIA, Judge of The Intermediate Appeals Court of Puerto Rico, SIXTO HERNANDEZ-SERRANO, Judge of the Appeals Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
US v. Candelario-Ramos
as 20-1988
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSUE CANDELARIO-RAMOS, a/k/a Josue Candelaria-Ramos, a/k/a Pocho
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In Re: Perez-Soto
as 20-1851
Respondent:
ROBERTO FELIBERTI-CINTRON, Judge of the Supreme Court, ANDRES SALAS-SOLER, Judge of the Appeals Court, HON. CARLOS CANDELARIA-ROSA, Judge of The Intermediate Appeals Court of Puerto Rico and others
Petitioner:
HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
Candelaria-Melendez v. Rivera-Percy
as 20-1668
Petitioner / Appellant:
OMAR A. CANDELARIA-MELENDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
VICTOR T. RIVERA-PERCY
Gonzalez-SaQuic De Xiquin, et al v. Barr
as 20-1561
Petitioner:
J-J-X-G JUVENILE, MALE and CANDELARIA GONZALEZ SAQUIC DE XIQUIN
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
US v. Candelaria-Monserrate
as 19-2183
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXIS CANDELARIA-MONSERRATE
US v. Candelaria-Monserrate
as 17-1216
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEXIS CANDELARIA-MONSERRATE
US v. Marin-Candelaria
as 16-2013
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS MARIN-CANDELARIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
