Cases 1 - 10 of 43
US v. Guerrero
as 23-1371
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN GUERRERO, a/k/a Pawtucket
US v. Rijo-Guerrero
as 23-1174
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HANSEL JANEL RIJO-GUERRERO
Hiram Perez-Soto v. Oronoz, et al
as 21-1404
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGDALIA FRATICELLI-TORRES, Judge of the Appeals Court, HON. GISELLE ROMERO-GARCIA, Judge of The Intermediate Appeals Court of Puerto Rico, SIXTO HERNANDEZ-SERRANO, Judge of the Appeals Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
Baez, et al v. Town of Brookline, et al
as 21-1278
Defendant / Appellee:
BERNARD E. GREENE, in his individual and official capacities, NANCY DALY, in her individual and official capacities, NEIL WISHINSKY, in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUANA BAEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOSE ALBERTO NUNEZ-GUERRERO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DEMETRIUS OVIEDO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
US v. Guerrero
as 21-1244
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN GUERRERO, a/k/a Pawtucket
Sanchez-Roa v. Guerrero-Medina, et al
as 21-1155
Respondent / Appellee:
EDGAR GUERRERO-MEDINA, INES DEL C. CARRAU-MARTINEZ and DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE ABNER SANCHEZ-ROA
In Re: Perez-Soto
as 20-1851
Respondent:
ROBERTO FELIBERTI-CINTRON, Judge of the Supreme Court, ANDRES SALAS-SOLER, Judge of the Appeals Court, HON. CARLOS CANDELARIA-ROSA, Judge of The Intermediate Appeals Court of Puerto Rico and others
Petitioner:
HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
Diaz-Irizarry et al v. Diaz-Irizarry et al
as 3:2020cv01366
Defendant:
BETTEROADS ASPHALT II LLC, Puerto Rico QUALITY SERVICES LLC, Puerto Rico Asphalt INC and others
Plaintiff:
PALOMA I GARCIA and ARTURO F DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
