Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. BRIDGES
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
ROYAL A SMITH and RICHARD E. BRIDGES ESQ.
Interested Party:
CITIZENS BANK NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. FARRAR et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON and BANK OF NEW YORK
Defendant:
TOINI FARRAR, CHARLES A SMITH, TOINI LYNN FARRAR and others
Interested Party:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and LVNV FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv00053
Defendant:
CURT W SMITH and AMY E SMITH
Interested Party:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv00310
Defendant:
CYNTHIA W SMITH, ROBERT P SMTIH and ROBERT P SMITH
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH H SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. SMITH
as 2:2019cv00219
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST
Defendant:
PASQUALE G SMITH, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00433
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC, BRYCO FUNDING INC, DAWN E SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00415
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NANCY M SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CALISTRO et al v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
as 1:2010cv00470
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE CALISTRO , MARCIA DEGRAFF , CARLTON D DUNCAN, JR and others
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
