Cases 1 - 10 of 12
US ex rel. Morgan-Lee v. Therapy Resources Management, LLC
as 23-2070
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY MORGAN-LEE, UNITED STATES, ex rel, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ex rel and others
Defendant:
THERAPY RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, LLC, WHITTIER HEALTH NETWORK, INC., HEALTH CONCEPTS, LTD, d/b/a Bayberry Commons, d/b/a Eastgate Nursing and Recovery Center, d/b/a Elmwood Health Center, d/b/a Heritage Hills Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, d/b/a Morgan Health Center, d/b/a Pine Grove Health Center, d/b/a Riverview and others
Zotos v. Hingham, MA, et al
as 23-1694
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERIC PETER ZOTOS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Frederic P. Zotos and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ex rel. Frederic P. Zotos
Defendant / Appellee:
HINGHAM, MA, ROGER FERNANDES, individually and as Town Engineer, TOM MAYO, individually and as Town Administrator and others
Flanagan v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
as 23-1305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN FLANAGAN, Relator
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel
Defendant / Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America
McGuire v. Estate of Robert Cunningham, et al
as 17-1106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MCGUIRE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RYAN UEHLING, ex rel, JOHN DOE, ESTATE OF ROBERT CUNNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
WENDY JOHNSON, ex rel, STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant:
HOWARD APPEL, JAMES SLATTERY, MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. and others
Interested Party:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and LAWRENCE K. SPITZ, MD
United States, ex rel. Lovell & Mckusick, et al v. Athenahealth, Inc.
as 22-1245
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES, Ex. Rel Cheryl Lovell and William McKusick, CHERYL LOVELL, Relator and WILLIAM MCKUSICK, Relator
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
United States, ex rel. Sanborn v. Athenahealth, Inc.
as 22-1246
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORDIE SANBORN and GEORDIE SANBORN, Relator
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
US, ex rel. Nargol & Langton, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 22-1182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., Known now as Medical Device Business Services, Inc., DEPUY, INC., Known now as DePuy Synthes, Inc. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
US, ex rel. Nargol & Langton, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 22-1047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., Known now as Medical Device Business Services, Inc., DEPUY, INC., Known now as DePuy Synthesis, Inc., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Silva-Ramirez, ex rel v. Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo, et al
as 16-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL DAVID SILVA-RAMIREZ, on behalf of United States of America
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel
Defendant - Appellee:
HOSPITAL ESPANOL AUXILIO MUTUO DE PUERTO RICO, INC., SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE AUXILIO MUTUO Y BENEFICIENCIA DE PUERTO RICO, ENRIQUE FIERRES-GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
MIGUEL ECHENIQUE-IPARRAGUIERRE, ADRIAN COLON-LARACUENTE, RAMON DELGADO-RUIBAL and others
Interested Party:
IVAN E. COLON
Silva-Ramirez, ex rel v. Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo, et al
as 16-1577
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel
Interested Party - Appellant:
SAMUEL DAVID SILVA-RAMIREZ, on behalf of United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
HOSPITAL ESPANOL AUXILIO MUTUO DE PUERTO RICO, INC., SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE AUXILIO MUTUO Y BENEFICIENCIA DE PUERTO RICO, ENRIQUE FIERRES-GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
MIGUEL ECHENIQUE-IPARRAGUIERRE, ADRIAN COLON-LARACUENTE, RAMON DELGADO-RUIBAL and others
Interested Party:
IVAN E. COLON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
