Cases 61 - 70 of 2,611
Nunez-Arellano v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2023cv01295
Petitioner:
Jose Nunez-Arellano
Respondent:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Camacho-Gordils v. USA
as 3:2023cv01290
Petitioner:
Jorge Camacho-Gordils
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garcia v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2023cv01285
Petitioner:
Manuel Garcia
Respondent:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez-Velez v. USA
as 3:2023cv01291
Petitioner:
Eduardo Rodriguez-Velez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Godoy-Ordonez v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2023cv01274
Petitioner:
Segundo Milton Godoy-Ordonez
Respondent:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez-Gonzalez v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2023cv01275
Petitioner:
Alfonso Hugo Sanchez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mcleod-Lopez v. Dumeng-Juarbe
as 3:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Matthew C Mcleod-Lopez
Defendant:
Madilyn Dumeng-Juarbe, Henry Luna-Bravo, Jose L. Arbelo-Velazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres-Ortiz v. USA
as 3:2023cv01255
Petitioner:
Elian Torres-Ortiz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cevallos v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2023cv01244
Petitioner:
Luis Antonio Cevallos
Respondent:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez-Rivera v. Ray
as 3:2023cv01243
Petitioner:
Rafael Ramirez-Rivera
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
