Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Gabler v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03072
Plaintiff:
Paul E Gabler, II and Paul E Gabler, II
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Davol Inc, CR Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hanson et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2009cv03029
Plaintiff:
Mark Hanson and Stephanie Hanson
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Bard Devices Inc, CR Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2009cv02956
Plaintiff:
Malinda King, Malinda King, Terry King and others
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Davol Inc, CR Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Linder v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2009cv03032
Plaintiff:
Robyn Linder and Robyn Linder
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sandberg v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv02986
Plaintiff:
Susanna G Sandberg
Defendant:
Davol, Inc, Davol, Inc, CR Bard, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
RHOADES v. DAVOL, INC., et al
as 1:2009cv02943
Plaintiff:
CINDY L. RHOADES and ROBERT J. RHOADES
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sierson v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2009cv02882
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Sierson
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANZIKOS et al v. CR BARD INC et al
as 1:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
JAMES LANZIKOS and MARYANN LANZIKOS
Defendant:
CR BARD INC and DAVOL INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kardes v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2009cv02788
Plaintiff:
Robert Kardes, Robert Kardes and Robert Kardes
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bradley et al v. CR Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02664
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Bradley and Ruby Bradley
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
