Cases filed in Rhode Island
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Eyth v. Davol, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv03560
Plaintiff: Bernard Eyth
Defendant: Davol, Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc. and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nungester, et al v. CR Bard, Inc., et al
as 1:2009cv02918
Plaintiff: Lola Nungester and Edward Nungester
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and John Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SONSTROM et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv02791
Plaintiff: CATHERINE SONSTROM and TIMOTHY SONSTROM
Defendant: Davol, Inc., Bard Devices, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Type: Torts - Injury Both
NOE et al v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02598
Plaintiff: LOY NOE, LOY NOE, LORRETTA NOE and others
Defendant: DAVOL INC., BARD DEVICES, INC, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury Both
KELLIE et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02562
Plaintiff: STEVEN KELLIE and LORI KELLIE
Defendant: Davol, Inc., Bard Devices, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Arista Records LLC et al v. Does 1-16
as 1:2008cv00314
Plaintiff: Arista Records LLC, Atlantic Recording Corporation, BMG Music and others
Defendant: Does 1-16
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arista Records LLC et al v. Does 1 - 22
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff: Arista Records LLC, Atlantic Recording Corporation, BMG Music and others
Defendant: Does 1 - 22
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Virgin Records America, Inc et al v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2007cv00171
Plaintiff: Virgin Records America, Inc, Warner Bros Records, Inc, London-Sire Records INc. and others
Defendant: John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?