Cases 51 - 60 of 66
White v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10260
Plaintiff:
David White
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc. and FanDuel Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cody Spiegel et al v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10231
Plaintiff:
Cody Spiegel and Curry Conaway
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc. and FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Genchanok v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10233
Plaintiff:
Artem Genchanok
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc. and DraftKings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOMEZ et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10239
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GOMEZ , Ricardo Alejandro Garcia and John Gerecs
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc. , DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank Martin v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10232
Plaintiff:
Frank Martin
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc. and FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10240
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc, FanDuel Inc. and DraftKings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cooper and Michael David Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guarino v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10234
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc, DraftKings Inc. and FanDuel Inc.
Plaintiff:
Guarino and Thomas Guarino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: DAILY FANTASY SPORTS LITIGATION
as 1:2016md02677
Defendant:
DAILY FANTASY SPORTS LITIGATION, MATTHEW BOCCIO, FANDUEL DEPOSITS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Hemrich, Kelly Griffin, Steven Brown and others
Amicus Curiae:
Aaron Rivera, Glenn Pena and Joseph Leckerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blum v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10063
Plaintiff:
Casey Blum
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc. and DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medina et al v. DRAFTKINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv13807
Plaintiff:
Karl Medina and Stephan Fernandez
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS, INC. and FANDUEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
