Cases 51 - 60 of 1,747
Shaw v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10091
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Shaw, Jr.
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Callier v. Direct 2 Home LLC
as 3:2024cv30005
Defendant:
Direct 2 Home LLC, D, Bradley Pereira and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Callier
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Manuel v. Parrett et al
as 1:2023cv13232
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Manuel
Defendant:
Khalid L Parrett, United States Department of Justice and USPS Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
DeWolf v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv13227
Plaintiff:
Andre L. DeWolf
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whittaker v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2023cv13209
Plaintiff:
Ketrina L. Whittaker
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 1:2023cv13205
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Brown
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tooker v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv13155
Plaintiff:
Betty L. Tooker
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peer v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv13158
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Peer
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2023cv13137
Plaintiff:
Avery L. Davis
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
