Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Adema Technologies v. Imaginit, et al
as 15-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADEMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a Gloria Solar (USA)
Defendant - Appellee:
IMAGINIT, INC. and PATRINA EIFFERT
Sundance Energy Oklahoma, et al v. Dan D Drilling Corp.
as 15-6135
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
SUNDANCE ENERGY OKLAHOMA, LLC, DBA SEO, LLC and SUNDANCE ENERGY, INC.
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellant:
DAN D DRILLING CORPORATION
Sundance Energy Oklahoma, LLC, et al v. Dan D. Drilling Corporation
as 15-6103
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
SUNDANCE ENERGY OKLAHOMA, LLC, DBA SEO, LLC and SUNDANCE ENERGY, INC.
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellant:
DAN D. DRILLING CORPORATION
Davis, et al v. Secretary USAF
as 14-2142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L.A. DAVIS and SARAH DAVIS, husband and wife, DBA D&D Equipment
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Northern Natural Gas Company v. L.D. Drilling, Inc., et al
as 11-3026
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
L.D. DRILLING, INC., VAL ENERGY, INC., ALLAM EXPLORATION, LLC and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
NASH OIL & GAS, INC.
Counter-Claimant:
STEVEN EUGENE YOUNG
Northern Natural Gas Company v. L.D. Drilling, Inc., et al
as 11-3024
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
L.D. DRILLING, INC., BILL R. MILTON, CARL DUDREY and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
VAL ENERGY, INC., NASH OIL & GAS, INC., ALLAM EXPLORATION, LLC and others
Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
STEVEN EUGENE YOUNG
Port City Properties, et al v. Union Pacific Railro
as 06-5187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PORT CITY PROPERTIES, an Oklahoma corporation, d/b/a Hodges Warehouse and ALPINE PROPERTIES, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
