Cases 11 - 20 of 1,678
Heide v. Kansas Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-3071
Plaintiff:
JAY STEVEN HEIDE
Defendant:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF KANSAS, FNU CURRY and others
Ellis v. Diggins, et al
as 24-1204
Plaintiff:
DAWAUNE ELLIS, II
Defendant:
ELIAS DIGGINS and DENVER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
Gonzaelz v. Brunnemer, et al
as 24-1200
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MANUEL TREVIZO GONZAELZ
Defendant:
KODY BRUNNEMER, in his individual and official capacity, KEVIN DOUGLAS, in his individual and official capacity and CITY OF GREELEY, COLORADO
Hume v. People of the State of Colorado
as 24-1197
Plaintiff:
COALIN JOSHUA HUME
Defendant:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Lombard-Jackson v. Bland, et al
as 24-1198
Plaintiff:
KIKI LOMBARD-JACKSON, AKA Kiki Kenyatia P.R. Whitaker, AKA Kiki Lombard-Knapp, AKA Kenyatia Kiki Patricia Reneeknapp-Whitaker Jackson, AKA Kiki Whitaker-Lombard, AKA Kiki Kenyatia Lombard Witt
Defendant:
(NFN) BLAND, BOYD, BETSY AKINSON and others
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Lombardi v. Prosecution and Code Enforcement Office, et al
as 24-1108
Plaintiff:
KIKI LOMBARDI, a/k/a K. Kiki Whitaker-Lombard and KIKI LOMBARD-JACKSON, a/k/a K. Kiki Whitaker-Lombard
Defendant:
PROSECUTION AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE, DENVER PROBATION AND CASES, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Fawley v. Lea County Correctional Facility, et al
as 24-2037
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN W. FAWLEY
Defendant:
LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC., R.C. SMITH, former Warden, L.C.C.F. and others
Thomas v. Tulsa County Sheriff, et al
as 24-5057
Plaintiff:
BYRON C. THOMAS
Defendant:
TULSA COUNTY SHERIFF, UNITED STATES MARSHALS, U.S. DEPUTY MARSHAL JOEY POFFEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
