Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Carr v. CoreCivic, et al
as 24-1302
Defendant:
BERRY GOODRICH, Warden, Crowley County Correctional Facility, CROWLEY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JEREMY BRANDT, PPNU Assistant Director and others
Plaintiff:
HESHIMO YAPHET CARR
Fernandez v. Greyhound Lines, et al
as 24-2095
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KIRK LEMMON, GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JESUS FRANCISCO FERNANDEZ
Fawley v. Lea County Correctional Facility, et al
as 24-2037
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN W. FAWLEY
Defendant:
LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC., R.C. SMITH, former Warden, L.C.C.F. and others
Rigsby v. Burkhulter, et al
as 24-7000
Plaintiff:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant:
FNU BURKHULTER, Nurse Practitioner, FNU BREWER, Nurse Practitioner, CORE CIVIC, INC. and others
Plater v. Topping, et al
as 23-6217
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM LA'MONZE PLATER
Defendant:
CHRISTINE TOPPING, (FNU) ROWLEY, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Plater v. Poirot, et al
as 23-6131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAHEEM LA'MONZE PLATER
Defendant / Appellee:
EDEN POIROT and GEO GROUP, INC.
Blake v. GEO Group, et al
as 23-2120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRESTON J. BLAKE
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INC., R. SMITH, J. BEAIRD, Wardens and others
Amaro v. Corizon Health, et al
as 23-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH, INC., UNKNOWN DENTIST #1 and others
Vreeland v. Voightsberger, et al
as 23-8020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL VOIGHTSBERGER, MICHAEL PACHECO, ANDREW BURKHALTER and others
Davis v. Ansari, et al
as 23-6040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHADID ANSARI, GEO/LCF Medical Director, individually and in his official capacity, GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
