Cases 31 - 40 of 144
Ford v. Jackson National Life, et al
as 21-1126
Intervenor Plaintiff:
LA'TONYA FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK and JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE DISTRIBUTORS LLC
Graff, et al v. Aberdeen Enterprizes, II, et al
as 21-5031
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY DERRYBERRY, Sheriff of LeFlore County, ABERDEEN ENTERPRIZES, II, INC., ADAM WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Latimer County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRA LEE WILKINS, LINDA MEACHUM, DAVID SMITH and others
Defendant:
P.D. TAYLOR, Sheriff of Oklahoma County
Crownhart v. Jackson, et al
as 21-1068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL CROWNHART
Defendant / Appellee:
SPECTRUM, NICK JACKSON, CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS and others
Johnson v. Williams, et al
as 21-1058
Defendant / Appellee:
CASADY, CHAD, KILPOLITES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Parks v. Taylor, et al
as 21-6014
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT FNU HENDERSHOT, SGT. FNU HANSON, LIEUTENANT FNU CARTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN ALEXANDER PARKS
McCleary v. Core Civic, et al
as 21-7001
Defendant / Appellee:
DIANA JONES, Trust fund accounts, MS. LINDSAY, RAY LARIMER, Health Services Chief and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELO VERNON MCCLEARY
Jackson v. Warden, USP-Leavenworth
as 21-3011
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP-LEAVENWORTH
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL JACKSON
Jackson v. Board of County Commissioners
as 21-6010
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OSCAR ROLANDO JACKSON
Johnson v. Franson, et al
as 21-1022
Defendant / Appellee:
MARLIN, ASHLEY FRANSON, DARRELL SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Sperry v. Wildermuth, et al
as 21-3009
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, BILL SHIPMAN, (FNU) HUNT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY J. SPERRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
