Cases 1 - 10 of 28
United States v. Dominguez-Dominguez
as 24-2051
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
URIEL DOMINGUEZ-DOMINGUEZ
Dominguez v. CIR
as 24-9001
Petitioner:
JACINTO RAMON DOMINGUEZ, JR.
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
In re: Smith
as 24-8004
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Respondent:
SHERIDAN CHIEF OF POLICE, in his official capacity, also known as Travis Koltiska, WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL and SHERIDAN COUNTY SHERIFF, in his official capacity, also known as Levi Dominguez
Dominguez-Ramos v. Garland
as 23-9519
Petitioner:
ELPIDIO DOMINGUEZ-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Gonzalez-Dominguez v. Garland
as 23-9518
Petitioner:
RENE ROBERTO GONZALEZ-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
United States v. Dominguez-Barradas
as 23-2003
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LINO DOMINGUEZ-BARRADAS
Dominguez Ogaz v. Garland
as 22-9584
Petitioner:
LADISLAO SERGIO DOMINGUEZ OGAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
United States v. Quintanilla-Dominguez
as 22-1198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL QUINTANILLA-DOMINGUEZ, AKA Luis F. Lopez-Montez, AKA Cesar Rodriguez
Vigil v. Tweed, et al
as 20-2100
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INSTITUTE, a political subdivision of the New Mexico Department of Health a division of the State of New Mexico, FRANCES TWEED, JOE CHAVEZ and others
Defendant:
ANTOINE WHITFIELD, Deputy, in his individual capacity as a deputy employed by the San Miguel's County Sherrif's Office, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MIGUEL, ANTHONY MADRID, Undersherrif, in his individual capacity as a deputy employed by the San Miguel County Sherrif's Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN VIGIL
Dominguez-Gutierrez v. Barr
as 20-9592
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE DOMINGUEZ-GUTIERREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
