Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Grant, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6129
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. GRANT, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIUS D. JONES, DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Defendant:
STEVE BURRAGE, EDWARD EVANS, Warden, KEVIN J. GROSS and others
Lay, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Not Yet Classified:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALEXANDER DAVIS, SHELTON D. JACKSON, JULIUS D. JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ABOUTANAA EL HABTI, Warden, Mabel Bassett Correctional Center, in her official capacity, SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC, in his official capacity, RANDY CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOE M. ALLBAUGH, IV TEAM LEADER, IV TEAM MEMBERS#1-10 and others
Amicus Curiae:
ALL NON-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, EXCEPT WADE LAW
United States v. Haynes
as 20-6011
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTIN TODD HAYNES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Glossip, et al v. Gross, et al
as 19-6002
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL W. ROACH, DIANNE B. OWENS, LAURA PITTMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALFRED B. MITCHELL, JOHN M. GRANT, BENJAMIN R. COLE, by and through his next friend Robert S. Jackson and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Gelder, et al v. CoxCom Inc., et al
as 12-706
Petitioner:
BRADLEY GELDER, BOBBY BOWICK, HENRY HOLMES and others
Respondent:
COXCOM INC., COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COX COMMUNICATIONS NEW ORLEANS, INC. and others
In re: Pemberton
as 11-6184
Petitioner:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Respondent:
JUSTIN JONES, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OKLAHOMA STATE REFORMATORY and others
In re: Pemberton
as 11-6034
Petitioner:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Respondent:
JUSTIN JONES, JAMES RUDEK, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
