Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lay v. American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, et al
as 21-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCOTT CROW, Director of ODOC and others
Davis v. GEO Group, et al
as 21-6099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK BOWEN, Warden, RITA HOOD, Major and others
Davis v. Core Civic, et al
as 21-7020
Defendant / Appellee:
SERENA BREWER, Nurse Practitioner - DCF, RHODA SHIVLEY, Nurse, RAY LARIMER, Health Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Martinez v. Social Security Administration
as 19-1227
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEANNA MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
Marshall v. HUD, et al
as 10-9571
Petitioner:
PAUL WAYNE MARSHALL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MERCEDES MARQUEZ, MARK JOHNSTON, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Community Planning and Development (CPD) and others
Moore Broadway Kids, et al v. Okla.Commission for Human Svcs, et al
as 09-6092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOORE BROADWAY KIDS, an Oklahoma corporation, KEONA SLEMP, MITCHELL SLEMP and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA COMMISSION FOR HUMAN SERVICES, HOWARD HENDRICK, as Director of Oklahoma Department for Human Services, MICHAEL FAIRLESS, individually and as Inspector General and others
Ramah Navajo Chapter, et al v. Kempthorne, et al
as 08-2262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMAH NAVAJO CHAPTER, OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE and PUEBLO OF ZUNI, for themselves and on behlaf of a class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Interior, EDDIE BROWN, Assistant Secretary of the Interior, MARVIN PIERCE, Chief of Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
