Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jackson v. Santander Consumer USA, et al
as 23-3243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRIS CHAPTER JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC., a Texas for profit Corporation, CHRYSLER CAPITAL, a subsidiary of Santander Consumer USA, Inc., T.E.N. INVESTMENTS INC., a Missouri for Profit Corporation and others
Allen, Jr., et al v. Environmental Restoration
as 19-2197
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARLENE KING, RAYMOND PETTIGREW, ANNIE OLDMAN and others
Defendant:
KINROSS GOLD USA, INC., SUNNYSIDE GOLD CORPORATION, KINROSS GOLD CORP. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, LLC
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN BARTON HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Calvin v. Lyon
as 15-6099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VANESSA G. CALVIN
Plaintiff:
IN RE ESTATE OF JIMMIE AND MERCY LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIRLEY ANN LYONS
States, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KIM DARNALL, DEBBILYNN DAVILA, JAMIE DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Halliburton, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LARRY JOHN COZART, R JUDITH DEMCHAK, BRADLEY DEMCHAK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Wade, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6292
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MONA SWOFFORD, CRUZE TALAVERSA, SHIRLEY TANNER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
McCaughtry, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TAMMY MCCAUGHTRY, TERESA MITCHELL, MICHELE MIXON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
