Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Ray v. Moon, et al
as 15-1290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUSTIN RAY
Defendant / Appellee:
ARLETA MOON, Special Agent I.R.S., EIGHT UNKNOWN FEDERAL I.R.S. AGENTS, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Stengel v. NM Corrections Dept., et al
as 15-2099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN STENGEL
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, GERMAN FRANCO, Warden of Penitentiary of New Mexico, GARY MARCIEL, title unknown and others
Stine v. Oliver, et al
as 15-1233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL G. STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN OLIVER, Warden, ADX, JULIAN, Associate Warden, ADX, C. PORRO, Unit Manager ADX and others
Hodson v. Fisher, et al
as 15-1173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS HODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BIRGIT M. FISHER, KAIRI VAHER, Nurse Practioner, JENNIFER, (Last Name Unknow) RN, Register Nurse and others
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and others
Jo v. Obama, et al
as 15-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA and SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS
Hodson v. Fisher, et al
as 15-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS HODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BIRGIT M. FISHER, KAIRI VAHER, Nurse Practioner, JENNIFER, (Last Name Unknow) RN, Register Nurse and others
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, CARL BEAR, Warden's Assistant and others
Jo v. Obama, et al
as 15-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA
Jo v. Obama
as 14-1437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, OR MR. PRESIDENT OF THE BARACK OBAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
