Cases 41 - 50 of 1,220
DeAtley v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1406
Petitioner:
ALAN DEATLEY, Tribal member, Tribal Sp. Counsel, Tribal Judge
Respondent:
WARDEN FAIRBAIRN, (A.V.C.F.), DIRECTOR WILLIAMS, (CDOC), GOV. POLIS and others
Butler v. Rainbolt
as 23-7091
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DUANE BUTLER
Defendant:
CARMEN RAINBOLT, Asst. District Attorney Okmulgee Co
Ramirez v. Northeast New Mexico Detention Facility, et al
as 23-2195
Petitioner:
LUIS RAMON RAMIREZ
Respondent:
NORTHEAST NEW MEXICO DETENTION FACILITY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Watson v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1392
Petitioner / Appellant:
WARREN D. WATSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF COLORADO
Chiwanga v. Drummond
as 23-5136
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKSON PETER CHIWANGA
Respondent / Appellee:
GENTNER F. DRUMMOND, Oklahoma Attorney General
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 23-8086
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEAN ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity a/k/a Neicole Molden
Blea v. Martinez, et al
as 23-2191
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH BLEA
Respondent / Appellee:
RICHARD MARTINEZ and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Tovar-Mendoza v. Martinez, et al
as 23-2186
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS TOVAR-MENDOZA
Respondent / Appellee:
RICHARDO MARTINEZ and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 23-8077
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEAN ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity a/k/a Neicole Molden
Perea v. Burtlow, et al
as 23-1356
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. PEREA
Respondent / Appellee:
MRS. BURTLOW, Fremont Correctional Facility Prison Warden and PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
