Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Randall v. Utah Board of Pardons & Parole
as 24-4069
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CHAD RANDALL
Defendant:
UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE
Isbill v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6064
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WILLIAM ISBILL
Defendant:
KEVIN STITT, Governor, LARRY MORRIS, Pardon & parole Board member, ADAM LUCK, Pardon & parole Board member and others
Kelley v. Stitt, et al
as 23-6200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP LEE KELLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN STITT, Governor, in his official and individual capacity, LARRY MORRIS, Pardon & Parole Board member, in his official and individual capacity, ADAM LUCK, Pardon & Parole Board member, in his official and individual capacity and others
Wach v. State of Utah, et al
as 23-4123
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL MICHAEL WACH
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Quintana v. Quintana, et al
as 23-4086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
JERLINE QUINTANA, BOARD OF PARDONS, All Chair Members, DAVID BEAL, Parole Agent and others
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Wach v. Varoz, et al
as 22-4077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL MICHAEL WACH
Defendant / Appellee:
BRETT VAROZ, CARRIE L. COCHRAN, GREG JOHNSON and others
Cobb v. Haddon, et al
as 22-4048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT MAYON COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY BENZON, Warden, Utah State Prison, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison, KENT DEMILL, Board of Pardons Chair Person and others
Cobb v. Haddon, et al
as 22-4016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT MAYON COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison, LARRY BENZON, Warden Utah State Prison, KENT DEMILL, Board of Pardons chair person and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
