Cases 11 - 20 of 2,936
Ricks, et al v. Polis, et al
as 24-1148
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALLEN RICKS and MOURAD KARIM MAES
Defendant:
JARED POLIS, Governor of the State of Colorado, PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General, JAY SUTHERLAND GRANT, Denver Disrict Court Judge and others
Maes, et al v. Polis, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
MOURAD KARIM MAES and JOHN ALLEN RICKS
Defendant:
JARED POLIS, Governor of the State of Colorado, PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General, JAY SUTHERLAND GRANT, Denver Disrict Court Judge and others
Farrow v. People of the State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1239
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FARROW
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
VERYL B. SCAIFE
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Adams v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-8039
Petitioner:
JETT GARRIOTT ADAMS
Respondent:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 24-8038
Petitioner:
SEAN ROGERS
Respondent:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity, AKA Neicole Molden
In re: Vreeland
as 24-1234
Petitioner:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent:
DAVID ZUPAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Thompkins v. Santistevan, et al
as 24-2054
Petitioner:
TERRICK L. THOMPKINS
Respondent:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
