Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Buffington v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3252
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BUFFINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLING, Warden of Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS, Phil Kline
Bafford v. Pokorski, et al
as 08-3171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN WILLIAM BAFFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
(FNU) POKORSKI, Correctional Officer I, in his individual and official capacity, KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, in her individual and official capacity and ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity
In re: Caenen, Jr.
as 08-3150
Petitioner:
ARTHUR J. CAENEN, JR.
Respondent:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Hutton v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, ROBERT WILLESDEN and (FNU) BAGBY
Hutton v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, RO BOESE, Correctional Officer, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, (FNU) MCFESSELL and others
Hutton v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, ROBERT WILLESDEN and (FNU) BAGBY
Shriner v. Rohlings, et al
as 08-3048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL K. SHRINER
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Hutton v. Rohlings, et al
as 08-3007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARECE TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and ROBERT WILLESDEN, Disciplinary Administrator, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Hutton v. Rohlings, et al
as 08-3006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARECE TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, ROBERT WILLESDEN, Disciplinary Administrator, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and D. E. WALLACE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
