Cases 21 - 30 of 166
Biodigester v. Murphy-Brown
as 22-4117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHIBRO BIODIGESTER
Defendant / Appellee:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
United States v. Murphy
as 22-7021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICK DWAYNE MURPHY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Murphy v. CIR
as 22-9001
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERESA G. MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Murphy v. Lamborn
as 22-1079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS ALLEN MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS LAMBORN, in ihs official capacity as a U.S. House Representative (CO-5)
Handy v. Dobbin, et al
as 21-1418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WYATT T. HANDY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. SHEDERICK DOBBIN, DET. LYNNETTE NEDERLAND, OFC. BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Standing Akimbo, et al v. United States
as 21-1379
Petitioner / Appellant:
STANDING AKIMBO, INC., a Colorado corporation, SPENCER KIRSON, SAMANTHA MURPHY and others
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through its agency the Internal Revenue Service
Grant, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6129
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. GRANT, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIUS D. JONES, DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Defendant:
STEVE BURRAGE, EDWARD EVANS, Warden, KEVIN J. GROSS and others
United States v. Murphy
as 21-3154
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER E. MURPHY
Murphy, et al v. United States
as 21-2074
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOMINIQUE BILLY, individually and as next friend of I.C. and S.D. minors, DENNIS P. MURPHY, Guardian Ad Litem for N.E.D., an incapacitated minor and JACOB DOTSON
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
