Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Frye v. Medina, et al
as 16-1101
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY P. FRYE
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden, FMCC and CYNTHIA COFFMAN
Medina v. Archuleta
as 16-1063
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH MEDINA
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, The Attorney General of Colorado
Medina-Velasquez v. Lynch
as 16-9505
Petitioner:
CARLOS ERNESTO MEDINA-VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, United States Attorney General
United States v. Hernandez-Medina
as 16-3026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ADALBERTO HERNANDEZ-MEDINA, AKA Beto, AKA Babeto
Medina v. Catholic Health Initiatives, et al
as 16-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANEEN MEDINA, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf fothe CHI Plans
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES, GERALDINE BEDNASH, MAUREEN COMER and others
United States v. Gallardo-Medina
as 15-1255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIAN GALLARDO-MEDINA
Medina v. Union Pacific R.R.
as 15-4065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ECTOR M. MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC R.R.
Dawson v. Brightwell, et al
as 15-1103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD BRIGHTWELL, PAUL AUDET and ANGEL MEDINA
Defendant:
SUSAN AUDET, a/k/a Deanne Audet, DINO WILLIAMS, STEVEN OWENS and others
Medina v. Falk, et al
as 15-1043
Petitioner - Appellant:
NICK RAUL MEDINA
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES FALK, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Brooks v. Medina, et al
as 14-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH CLAYTON BROOKS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden DCOC, individually and in his official capacity, DAVID GABRIEL, Captain CDOC, individually and in his official capacity, MATHILL-AARON, Sergeant CDOC, individually and in her official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
