Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 450
Parker v. Martin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-6033
Petitioner / Appellant: ALVIN PARKER
Respondent / Appellee: TERRY MARTIN, Warden
Torgerson, et al v. LCC International
as 23-3039
Plaintiff / Appellee: RICHARD TORGERSON, ROBERT HALL, SHELLEY GORDON and others
Defendant / Appellant: LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Virginia corporation
Defendant: KENNY YOUNG, BRIAN DUNN, REBECCA STAHL and others
Ezell v. Hininger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-7007
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee: DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Davalos v. Gossett, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1024
Plaintiff / Appellant: PEDRO DAVALOS
Defendant / Appellee: TIFFANY GOSSETT, CARL STEINKE, KEITH BORDERLON and others
Shields v. City of Olathe, Kansas, et al
as 22-3277
Plaintiff / Appellant: MELVIN L. SHIELDS
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF OLATHE, KANSAS, CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, Kansas City, Kansas and others
Carter v. Genesis Alkali, et al
as 22-8078
Plaintiff / Appellant: AUSTIN ROGER CARTER
Defendant / Appellee: GENESIS ALKALI LLC, GENESIS ENERGY LP, CODY J. PARKER and others
Pittman v. Kahn, et al
as 22-1388
Plaintiff / Appellant: EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee: JEREMY KAHN, IMM, GOSSETT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3241
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Carter v. , et al
as 22-8070
Petitioner: In re: AUSTIN ROGER CARTER
Respondent: GENESIS ALKALI LLC, GENESIS ENERGY LP, CODY J. PARKER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3217
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?