Cases 41 - 45 of 45
Ellis, et al v. Brown, et al
as 09-6115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL ELLIS, LARRY CHANEY, ROY GENE EASTERWOOD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. BROWN, SR., Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, CLINTON JOHNSON, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, RICHARD DUGGER, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board and others
In Re Douglas Burns
as 08-1360
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS BURNS
Respondent:
JOHN W. SUTHERS and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cali, et al v. Williams Companies, et al
as 08-5100
Plaintiff:
WMB HGK PLAINTIFFS, GEORGE CHIDLAE WEISZ, LAWRENCE M COHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD E. JANZEN, KEN KINNEAR, MATTHEW W. BROSS and others
Defendant:
BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BNP PARIBAS, COMMERZBANK CAPITAL MARKETS CORP and others
Objector:
CASCIA II and LISA COMER
Intervenor:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and DAVID SCHULTZ
Movant - Appellant:
ALEX MERUELO, class member, NORMAN H. KIRKENDOLL and WCG SUBCLASS
Movant:
MELIS PARONYAN, HGK ASSET MANAGEMENT INC., JAY-BEE IMPORTS, INC and others
Dobson, et al v. Anderson, et al
as 08-7018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAT DOBSON and DONNIE DOBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHEENA DELL ANDERSON, an individual, SHARON ARNOLD, an individual, ANDREA BAKER and others
Cali, et al v. Williams Companies, et al
as 07-5119
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHIDLAE WEISZ, WMB HGK PLAINTIFFS, LAWRENCE M COHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC., sued as: Williams Companies, Inc., separately and senior management, WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., KEITH E. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BNP PARIBAS, COMMERZBANK CAPITAL MARKETS CORP and others
Objector:
CASCIA II and LISA COMER
Intervenor:
DAVID SCHULTZ and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Movant - Appellant:
WCG SUBCLASS, NORMAN H. KIRKENDOLL and ALEX MERUELO, class member
Movant:
MELIS PARONYAN, DARRYL ABRAMOWITZ, HGK ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
