Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sparrow v. UMR, et al
as 24-1118
Plaintiff:
RACHEL SPARROW, Individually and on behalf of her minor child, H.S.
Defendant:
UMR, INC., THE AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN FOR ACTIVE EMPLOYEES and AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Bradshaw, et al v. American Airlines, et al
as 23-5074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH BRADSHAW and CHRYSTAL ANTAO
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and MESA AIRLINES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meadows v. Allied Pilots Association, et al
as 15-4139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE M. MEADOWS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-5041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States, et al v. Albert Investment Company, Inc, et al
as 08-6267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERT INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., APAC ARKANSAS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Rollins v. Administrative Rev
as 07-9521
Not A Party In Lower Court - Petitioner:
DARRELL ROLLINS, an individual
Not A Party In Lower Court - Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Intervenor:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Niles v. American Airlines, et al
as 07-3032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESA F. NILES
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and TRANSWORLD AIRLINES, LLC, UNIVERSAL WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 06-5135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.