Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Smith v. Mantle
as 19-6120
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WHETSEL, STACY BOWEIN, DAVID PRATTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Green v. Reynolds, et al
as 15-6158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKKE LEON GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN REYNOLDS, ROBERT PATTON, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Pinson v. FBP, et al
as 13-1191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ANTHONY OSAGIE, DAVID ALLRED and others
Hall v. State of Maryland, et al
as 11-1418
Petitioner - Appellant:
LORENZO D. HALL, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Cali, et al v. Williams Companies, et al
as 08-5100
Plaintiff:
WMB HGK PLAINTIFFS, GEORGE CHIDLAE WEISZ, LAWRENCE M COHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD E. JANZEN, KEN KINNEAR, MATTHEW W. BROSS and others
Defendant:
BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BNP PARIBAS, COMMERZBANK CAPITAL MARKETS CORP and others
Objector:
CASCIA II and LISA COMER
Intervenor:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and DAVID SCHULTZ
Movant - Appellant:
ALEX MERUELO, class member, NORMAN H. KIRKENDOLL and WCG SUBCLASS
Movant:
MELIS PARONYAN, HGK ASSET MANAGEMENT INC., JAY-BEE IMPORTS, INC and others
Cali, et al v. Williams Companies, et al
as 07-5119
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHIDLAE WEISZ, WMB HGK PLAINTIFFS, LAWRENCE M COHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC., sued as: Williams Companies, Inc., separately and senior management, WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., KEITH E. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BNP PARIBAS, COMMERZBANK CAPITAL MARKETS CORP and others
Objector:
CASCIA II and LISA COMER
Intervenor:
DAVID SCHULTZ and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Movant - Appellant:
WCG SUBCLASS, NORMAN H. KIRKENDOLL and ALEX MERUELO, class member
Movant:
MELIS PARONYAN, DARRYL ABRAMOWITZ, HGK ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
