Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3284
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harrison v. Envision Management Holding, Inc. Board, et al
as 22-1098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT HARRISON, on behalf of himself and ROBERT HARRISON, on behalf of himself, the Envision Management Holding, Inc. ESOP, and all other similarly situated individuals.
Defendant / Appellant:
ENVISION MANAGEMENT HOLDING, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ENVISION MANAGEMENT HOLDING, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN COMMITTEE, ARGENT TRUST COMPANY and others
Stewart v. DOI
as 08-4020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREVOR D. STEWART, TODD PHILLIPS, JOE PHILLIPS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the Department of the Interior of the United States, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, in his capacity as Secreatry of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
CANYONLANDS GRAZING CORPORATION and GRAND CANYON TRUST
Not A Party In Lower Court - Amicus Curiae:
CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO, COALITION OF ARIZONA/NEW MEXICO COUNTIES FOR STABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, NEW MEXICO CATTLE GROWERS ASSOCIATION and others
Stewart, et al v. DOI, et al
as 07-4200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TREVOR D. STEWART, TODD PHILLIPS, JOE PHILLIPS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the Department of the Interior of the United States, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, in his capacity as Secreatry of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Defendant-Intervenor:
CANYONLANDS GRAZING CORPORATION and GRAND CANYON TRUST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
