Cases 51 - 60 of 874
Woodroff v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Woodroff
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Adam Good, Steve Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farrow v. Harpe
as 6:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
James Allen Farrow and James Alan Farrow
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenuine v. Tuggle
as 6:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Jacob Benjamin Jenuine
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Respondent:
Terry Tuggle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brauning v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00195
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
John Gilbert Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gray v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
Darvin W. Gray
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Buss
as 6:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Thomas Jesse Ward
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fish v. Bennet
as 6:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Brandis N. Fish
Respondent:
Bennet and Kimberly Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McDermott v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
David Bruce McDermott, II
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dennis v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Lance A. Dennis
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ware-Mustapha v. Zooky
as 6:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
Eric Ware-Mustapha
Respondent:
K. Zooky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
