Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lemay v. Wells Fargo Bank/Home Mortgage et al
as 4:2016cv00749
Plaintiff:
William Keith Lemay
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank/Home Mortgage and Brett D Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2015cv00587
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Department of Human Resources, Sharron Kay Wells, Rodney Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. All Superior Courts of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2015cv00586
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
All Superior Courts of Oklahoma, County of Tulsa, Tulsa County DHS-CPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Felty et al
as 4:2015cv00588
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Kyle Felty, Brandy O'Brian, Brandy Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al vs. Lake, et al
as 4:2015cv00351
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Edward Lake, Sharron Wells, Dewey Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Torres et al
as 4:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Fred C Lollis and Rosemary A Lollis
Defendant:
Rene Torres and Sharron Wells
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Lollis et al v. Wells
as 4:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
Fred C Lollis and Rosemary A Lollis
Defendant:
Sharron Kay Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ranes v. Hill et al
as 4:2012cv00517
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dale Ranes
Defendant:
Eric J Hill, Harold R Wells, Ernest Bruce Bonham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. City of Miami, The et al
as 4:2012cv00346
Plaintiff:
Michael Romero
Defendant:
City of Miami, The, Kent Ketcher, Rudy Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2012cv00263
Plaintiff:
Hugo Alberto Gutierrez
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, John K Gray, Harold Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
