Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Price v. Harpe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00566
Petitioner: Darren Lee Price, Jr
Respondent: Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Parris et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant: John Everett Parris, Rachel Marie Dallis, Jeffery Bryant Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Cherokee Nation
as 4:2022cv00534
Petitioner: Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent: Cherokee Nation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lee v. Whitten
as 4:2022cv00307
Petitioner: Glendell Dewayne Lee
Respondent: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Rankins
as 4:2022cv00225
Petitioner: Jerry Lee Mays
Respondent: Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blount v. Clayton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00199
Petitioner: Christopher Lee Blount
Respondent: Dean Clayton and Deon Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Kunzweiler et al
as 4:2022cv00153
Plaintiff: Mr. David Lee Benson and David Lee Benson
Defendant: Steve Kunzweiler, Kenneth Allan Filmore, Tanya Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melcher v. Huber et al
as 4:2022cv00128
Plaintiff: Devin Lee Melcher
Defendant: James Huber and Mark Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Nunn
as 4:2021cv00466
Petitioner: Richard Lee Miller
Respondent: Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haak v. Nunn
as 4:2021cv00477
Petitioner: Christopher Lee Haak
Respondent: Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?