Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Prichard v. Mullet et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Jim Mullet, James Richardson, Garvin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarclay v. Averitt et al
as 5:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Jesse Manquan Yarclay
Defendant:
L Averitt, Dr L Averitt, Ms K Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Xiong v. McCormick et al
as 5:2020cv00726
Defendant:
William McCormick, Jennifer Turnage, Nicholas Gamble and others
Plaintiff:
Pao Xiong and Pao Hue Yeng Xiong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Xiong v. McCormick et al
as 5:2017cv00873
Plaintiff:
Pao Xiong
Defendant:
William McCormick, Nichols Gamble, Katie Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00757
Movant:
William Bernard Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Freeman v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00677
Movant:
William Bernard Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
De La Cruz v. Graber et al
as 5:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Armando Garcia De La Cruz
Defendant:
John Doe, Katie N Freeman, Amy C Mayberry Hollis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Cruz v. Graber et al
as 5:2014cv01209
Plaintiff:
Armando Garcia De La Cruz
Defendant:
John Doe, Katie N Freeman, Carlos Mier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
