Cases 61 - 68 of 68
Fournerat v. Wisconsin Law Review et al
as 5:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
Wayne M Fournerat
Defendant:
Wisconsin Law Review, Rodney Uphoff, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Law et al v. Central United Life Insurance Company
as 5:2008cv00938
Plaintiff:
Scott Law and Donna Law
Defendant:
Central United Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fournerat v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents et al
as 5:2008cv00248
Plaintiff:
Wayne M Fournerat
Defendant:
University of Wisconsin Board of Regents, University of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Law School and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harvey v. Scott Lowery Law Office PC et al
as 5:2007cv00935
Plaintiff:
Tori M Harvey
Defendant:
Scott Lowery Law Office PC, John D Harker and D Grahm Parker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cagle v. James Street Group The et al
as 5:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Robyn Cagle, Robyn Cagle and Robyn Cagle
Defendant:
James Street Group, The, James Street Group, The, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
Robyn Cagle, Robyn Cagle and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Interpleader:
Wyeth Corporation, Catherine L Garland and Catherine L Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
