Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hooper v. Hogue et al
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Demetric Lemond Hooper
Defendant:
Tiana Lorissa Robinson-Hogue, Oklahoma City Police Department, BioLife Plasma Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peralta et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 5:2021cv00838
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Peralta, Brian Grady and Michael Jones
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fritz v. AT&T Mobility Disability Benefits Program for Southwest Bargained Employees et al
as 5:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Mildred Fritz
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Disability Benefits Program for Southwest Bargained Employees, AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1, AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Edmonds et al v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company et al
as 5:2009cv01379
Plaintiff:
Jane F Edmonds, Vicki L Campbell and Vickie C Leyja
Defendant:
American Telephone and Telegraph Company and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cameron v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Bruce C Cameron
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and Dobson Communications LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Parks v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00212
Plaintiff:
Billie Parks
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and Radio Shack Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
