Cases 21 - 30 of 108
Pardede, et al v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9570
Petitioner:
TIONIDA SAUFNI PARDEDE and FRANSISCA NOVELINA
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Perez-Hernandez v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9567
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS PEREZ-HERNANDEZ, AKA Jose L. Perez-Hernandez, AKA Jose Luis Perez, AKA Jose Hernandez
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Rodriguez-Rodriguez v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9566
Petitioner:
ERASMO RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Mendiola v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9565
Petitioner:
EDDIE MENDIOLA
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Raju v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9562
Petitioner:
KULWINDER SINGH RAJU
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9563
Petitioner:
JIAN BO LIN
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Masse, et al v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9561
Petitioner:
CHANTAL MILFORD MASSE, SANDY LAWRENCE MASSE, MURIELLE HUSSEN MASSE and others
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Charalambos, et al v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9560
Petitioner:
MARIA AMANDA CHARALAMBOS and CAROLINA CHARALAMBOS
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General
Castellon-Guzman v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9559
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO CASTELLON-GUZMAN
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Wu v. Holder, Jr.
as 08-9558
Petitioner:
ZHONGZHENG WU
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.