Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 44,268
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff: Douglas Mastriano
Defendant: James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
C.J. v. Santosa and Brother Inc.
as 1:2024cv01548
Plaintiff: C.J.
Defendant: SANTOSA AND BROTHER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Receivership Estate of Blue Isle Markets Inc. and Blue Isle Markets LTD., The v. Equiti Capital UK Limited et al
as 1:2024cv00912
Plaintiff: Blue Isle Markets Ltd. and Receivership Estate of Blue Isle Markets Inc. and Blue Isle Markets LTD., The
Petitioner: The Receivership Estate of Blue Isle Markets Inc.
Defendant: Equiti Capital UK Ltd., Equiti Capital Armenia CJSC, Equiti Capital UK Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 - Receiver of Property in Different Districts
In re: Stang
as 24-4060
Petitioner: In re: JOE DEE STANG
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Shenzhen Gooloo v. Pilot
as 24-1135
Not Yet Classified: SHENZHEN GOOLOO E-COMMERCE CO. LTD., PILOT, INC. and SHENZHEN GOOLOO E-COMMERCE CO., LTD.
Tri-State Generation v. FERC
as 24-9538
Petitioner: TRI-STATE GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION ASSOCIATION, INC.
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
AR Design Innovations LLC v. Rove Concepts LTD
as 2:2024mc00386
Plaintiff: AR Design Innovations LLC
Defendant: Rove Concepts LTD
Respondent: Expivi Inc
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner: JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
United States v. Campus
as 24-5068
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAKOTA WAYNE CAMPUS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?