Cases 51 - 60 of 74
United States v. Medina-Talamante
as 11-8066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EFRAIN MEDINA-TALAMANTES
Del Campo et al v. American Corrective Counseling Services et al
as 2:2011mc00744
Plaintiff:
Elena M. Del Campo , Lois Artz and Charles Schwab & Assoc
Consol_plaintiff:
Miriam Campos , Lisa Johnston and Ashorina Medina
Defendant:
American Corrective Counseling Services , Don R. Mealing and Bruce D. Raye
Consol_defendant:
Lynn R. Hasney and Inc Fundamentals
Thirdparty_defendant:
Damon Wright
Intervenor:
Maria Hamilton , Audra Phillips and Lydia Rosario
Movant:
Mary K. Mealing
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States, et al v. Vargas-Medina
as 11-1356
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARLON JAVIER VARGAS-MEDINA, AKA Carlos Caria, AKA Marlo Vargas-Reyna, AKA Marlon Acosta-Vargas, AKA Norlan J. Vargas
United States v. Garcia-Medina
as 11-3227
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RENATO GARCIA-MEDINA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Medina-Monte
as 10-3298
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE MEDINA-MONTES
United States v. Medina-Monte
as 10-3299
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE MEDINA-MONTES
United States v. Medina-Gonzalez
as 10-8097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ABEL MEDINA-GONZALEZ
United States v. Pinon-Medina
as 10-2081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL PINON-MEDINA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
