Cases 51 - 60 of 11,505
Flemons (PS) v. State of Colorado Administration
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
State of Colorado Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cramer (PS) v. State of CO Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01310
Plaintiff:
Chelsea C. Cramer
Defendant:
State of CO Department of Human Services, Weld Department of Human Services and Office of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemons (PS) v. Gates
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Bill Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemons (PS) v. Hunt
as 1:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Mark Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemons (PS) v. Anschutz
as 1:2024cv01319
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Philip Anschutz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemons (PS) v. US Military
as 1:2024cv01321
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
US Military
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flemons (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Michael GA Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Viegas et al v. Toyota Financial Services et al
as 1:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Keri L Viegas, James Viegas and Keri Lynn Viegas
Defendant:
Toyota Financial Services and Predator Recovery Inc. doing business as Sure Shot Recovery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keating v. Valdez et al
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Robert Patrick KEATING
Defendant:
Rich VALDEZ, Board of County Commissioners of Archuleta County Colorado, Sheriff Mike Le Roux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
