Cases 21 - 30 of 15,717
Frazier (PS) v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01699
Plaintiff:
David T. Frazier
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, C. Lindgren, K. Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera Dimas (PS) v. Lilley
as 1:2024cv01094
Petitioner:
Munguia Herrera Dimas
Respondent:
No Named Respondent and Josh Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boudovin (PS) v. Gittins
as 1:2024cv01666
Petitioner:
Justin Boudovin
Respondent:
G. Gittins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rutledge (PS) v. Martha et al
as 1:2024cv01687
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Rutledge
Defendant:
Martha and Frank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv01680
Petitioner:
Michael E. Morgan
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Snow (PS) v. McCullough et al
as 1:2024cv01675
Plaintiff:
Dennis Snow
Defendant:
Zachary McCullough, City of Grand Junction and Mesa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El (PS) v. Lockheed Martin Space et al
as 1:2024cv01665
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Space, Amy Jackson and Andrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Joel Baker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puana v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01088
Petitioner:
Rudolph Puana
Respondent:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Labrum (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01651
Petitioner:
Daniel Cole Labrum
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
