Cases 1 - 10 of 6,820
Maier v. Kobach
as 5:2024cv03166
Respondent:
Kris Kobach
Petitioner:
Christopher Coty Maier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Provorse v. Ward
as 5:2024cv03162
Plaintiff:
Chad Dwayne Provorse
Defendant:
Gene Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Harlan
as 5:2024cv03164
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Wilson
Defendant:
Daniel Harlan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Moon et al
as 5:2024cv03165
Defendant:
(fnu) Gonzales, (fnu) Koontz, K. Moon and others
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Wiles
as 5:2024cv03163
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Roberts
Defendant:
Truman Wiles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Hayden et al
as 5:2024cv03161
Petitioner:
Ronald G. Crayton, Jr.
Respondent:
Daryl W. Reece and Calvin H. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Escalante v. Droege et al
as 5:2024cv03160
Defendant:
Charles James Droege and Gregory Goheen
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George (ID 81547) v. Payne-Delano et al
as 5:2024cv03123
Plaintiff:
Lewis Michael George
Defendant:
C. Gordon Harrod, Vanessa Payne-Delano, Tommy Williams and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waterman v. Cherokee County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2024cv03159
Defendant:
Michelle Tippie, D. Ackley, (fnu) Eshelman and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Waterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castaneda v. State of Kansas
as 5:2024cv03157
Petitioner:
Joshua R Castaneda
Respondent:
State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
