Cases 51 - 60 of 664
Coomer v. Lindell et al
as 1:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
Eric Coomer
Defendant:
Michael Lindell, Frankspeech, LLC, MyPillow, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
Andrea M Hall
Interested Party:
CD Solutions, Inc., Joseph Oltmann and Tina Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Levings, et al v. Dimont & Associates, et al
as 23-7004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARGARET LEVINGS and JAMES LEVINGS
Defendant / Appellee:
DIMONT & ASSOCIATES, LLC and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Skull Valley Health Care LLC et al v. Urias
as 2:2023cv00163
Defendant:
Sheila Urias and Shelia Urias
Plaintiff:
Skull Valley Health Care LLC and Skull Valley Health Clinic LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hayner v. International Business Times Media, LLC
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayner
Defendant:
International Business Times, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Goldsmith v. United States
as 23-7002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE GOLDSMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hayner v. Heavy, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayner
Defendant:
Heavy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
United Capital Management of Kansas, et al v. Nelson
as 23-3005
Plaintiff:
UNITED CAPITAL MANAGEMENT OF KANSAS, INC. and CHAD M. KOEHN
Counter Claimant:
MICHAEL E. NELSON
Holcomb
as 1:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Ms Glynda Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question - Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Gomez Paz v. Intermountain Healthcare
as 2:2022cv00797
Plaintiff:
Silvana Esther Gomez Paz
Defendant:
Intermountain Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Luckett
as 6:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Chloe Thomas
Defendant:
Angelo Bradford Luckett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
