Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pauna et al v. Swift Transportation CO of Arizona LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00137
Plaintiff:
Nicole Pauna and Constantin Cristian Pauna
Defendant:
Roger Dalelee Brownell and Swift Transportation CO of Arizona LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haynes v. Foulston et al
as 5:2016cv01152
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Haynes
Defendant:
Nola Foulston, Marc Bennett and Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mecham et al v. Luck et al
as 2:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
Glen Mecham and Diane Mecham
Defendant:
LeRoy Luck, Barbara Luck, Roger Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Al-Dahir v. Hamlin, et al
as 11-3327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR A. AL-DAHIR
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER HAMLIN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and ERICSSON SERVICES, INC.
Al-Dahir v. Hamlen et al
as 2:2010cv02571
Plaintiff:
Omar A. Al-Dahir
Defendant:
Roger Hamlen, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Ericsson Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson et al v. Grisham et al
as 6:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
William N. Peterson, Gary L. Rogers, Gary Rogers and others
Defendant:
John Grisham, Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Random House, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Procter & Gamble, et al v. Randy Haugen, et al
as 08-4137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE and PROCTER & GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY L. HAUGEN, individually doing business as Freedom Associates, Inc., STEVEN E. BRADY, STEPHEN L. BYBEE and others
Procter & Gamble, et al v. Haugen, et al
as 08-4134
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PROCTER & GAMBLE and PROCTER & GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDY L. HAUGEN, individually doing business as Freedom Associates, Inc., STEVEN E. BRADY, STEPHEN L. BYBEE and others
Defendant:
ROGER D. PATTON, FREEDOM TOOLS INCORPORATED and FREEDOM ASSOCIATES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
