Cases 61 - 70 of 7,894
Burren v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Susan Burren
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Farooqui v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Fasiha Farooqui
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Murphy v. Schaible, et al
as 24-1156
Plaintiff:
DIANNA CHRISTINE MURPHY
Defendant:
THOMAS SCHAIBLE and SCHAIBLE, RUSSO & COMPANY, C.P.A.'S, L.L.P.
Hager v. Blazin Wings, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Vickie Hager
Defendant:
Blazin Wings, Inc. doing business as Buffalo Wild Wings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Caudle v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Laura Caudle
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Beard v. English et al
as 6:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Randy Beard
Defendant:
Billy English and Sethiena English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moya v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Moya
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Eaton v. Sam's West, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Nancy Eaton
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. a foreign corporation, Doing Business As SAM'S CLUB Store No. 6238 doing business as Sam's Club Store No. 6238 and Sam's West, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pederson v. Menard Inc
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Arlene Pederson
Defendant:
Menard Inc and Menard Inc doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Parker v. Grubhub Holdings Inc.
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Kelly Parker
Defendant:
Grubhub Holdings Inc. doing business as Grubhub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
