Cases 121 - 130 of 1,442
Conlan v. Guardian Group et al
as 1:2022cv02246
Plaintiff:
Mark B. Conlan, Receiver and Mark B. Conlan
Defendant:
Guardian Group, Karibu-Sana Friends of the Carmelite Missions TX, Karibu Sana Friends of the Carmelite Missions TX and others
Interested Party:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Hollins v. Paparazzi, LLC
as 2:2022cv00553
Plaintiff:
Tamie Hollins
Defendant:
Paparazzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sepulveda v. Kansas Car Finder, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02338
Defendant:
Jonathan Sepulveda, John Sepulveda, Kansas Car Finder, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burgess v. Paparazzi, LLC
as 2:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Irene Burgess
Defendant:
Paparazzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wollerman v. Silk Operating Company LLC
as 1:2022cv02169
Plaintiff:
Heidi Wollerman
Defendant:
Silk Operating Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gutman v. PointsBet USA Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02137
Plaintiff:
Eric Gutman
Defendant:
PointsBet USA Inc., PointsBet New York LLC, PointsBet Indiana, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Meyer v. BioMedGPS, LLC
as 1:2022cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kristina Meyer
Defendant:
BioMedGPS, LLC doing business as SmartTRAK
Counter Claimant:
BioMedGPS, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
AcuityMD, Inc.
Marin v. Ross, et al
as 22-1239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY DALE ROSS, JR. and ROADRUNNER SCOOTERS LLC
Storey v. Seipel
as 2:2022cv00486
Defendant:
Tanya Seipel and Tonya Seipel
Plaintiff:
Lisa Storey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gilbert v. Paparazzi, LLC
as 2:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Heather Gilbert
Defendant:
Paparazzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
