Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Adams v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
Robert E Adams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Mai Mechanical Corporation v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Mai Mechanical Corporation
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Mark Talbott, Christina M. Paulson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Shams v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2015cv00197
Plaintiff:
Ziaush Shams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Micke v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Keith Micke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Reality Technology, et al v. United States
as 15-1366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REALITY TECHNOLOGY, INC., IVAN DRINKS, SR. and IVAN DRINKS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rangel v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Candy Rangel
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Diaz et al
as 1:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
Paul Diaz, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deacon v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00213
Plaintiff:
John J Deacon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Farmers Insurance Company Inc et al v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00932
Plaintiff:
Farmers Insurance Company Inc and Rocky Mutz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
