Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Anderson v. Cline et al
as 5:2010cv03116
Petitioner:
Jesse Ray Anderson
Respondent:
Sam Cline and Steve N. Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson-Bey v. Zavara
as 10-1159
Petitioner - Appellant:
VIRGIL ANDERSON-BEY
Respondent - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections
Anderson v. Hartley et al
as 1:2010cv00677
Petitioner:
Benjamin Anderson
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Oklahoma, State of
as 4:2009cv00776
Petitioner:
Douglas Christopher Anderson
Respondent:
Oklahoma, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kinsey v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv00143
Petitioner:
Rickey H. Kinsey
Respondent:
Randall Anderson, United States Parole Commission and United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez v. Anderson
as 1:2009cv02184
Petitioner:
Ismael Arenas Gonzalez
Respondent:
Marty Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Williams
as 4:2009cv00414
Petitioner:
Richard Lloyd Anderson
Respondent:
Greg Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv01399
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Anderson
Respondent:
Hoyt Brill and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montano et al v. Hartley et al
as 1:2009cv00237
Petitioner:
Anderson Montano
Respondent:
Steve Hartley, Aristedes Zavaras and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prost v. Wiley
as 08-1455
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH PROST
Respondent - Appellee:
RON WILEY, Warden and CARL ANDERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
