Cases 41 - 50 of 17,686
Johnson v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JENNIFER HANSEN, Warden Colorado Territorial Correction Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Sheppard (ID 6003638) v. Snyder
as 5:2024cv03059
Petitioner:
Marlon Dwane Sheppard
Respondent:
Paul Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colliver v. Pettigrew
as 4:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Erich Dwayne Colliver
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmington (PS) v. Gittins
as 1:2024cv01193
Petitioner:
David W Simmington, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Gittins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spalding v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, et al
as 24-6081
Petitioner:
DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS, WARDEN GOLDEY, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robertson (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01203
Petitioner:
Lonnie Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Betts (PS) v. Long
as 1:2024cv01164
Petitioner:
Terry Betts
Respondent:
Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cromar v. Davis County Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Paul Kenneth Cromar
Respondent:
Davis County Correctional Facility
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMurtry v. No Named Defendant
as 24-1175
Petitioner:
GREGG PHILIP MCMURTRY
Respondent:
NO NAMED DEFENDANT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
